Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 676
Filtrar
2.
J Clin Med ; 13(9)2024 Apr 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38731173

RESUMO

Background: Significant pericardial effusion requires percutaneous drainage. Some patients experience recurrent pericardial effusion following index drainage, but its risk factors remain unknown. Such knowledge should further improve the clinical management of individuals presenting with pericardial effusion for risk stratification and the construction of therapeutic and management strategies beforehand. Methods: Patients who underwent percutaneous drainage for pericardial effusion between 2018 and 2023 were retrospectively included and were followed for 2 years or until November 2023. Baseline factors associated with recurrent pericardial effusion that required percutaneous drainage again were investigated to identify the high-risk cohort. Results: A total of 39 patients (83 years on median, 28 males) were included. During the 2-year observation period, 11 patients had the primary outcome. The left ventricular end-diastolic diameter at baseline was independently associated with the primary outcome with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.88 (95% confidence interval 0.80-0.97, p = 0.013) with a cutoff of 42 mm, which significantly stratified the cumulative incidence of the primary outcome (53% versus 10%, p = 0.011). Conclusions: Recurrent pericardial effusion after percutaneous drainage is not a rare phenomenon. A smaller left ventricular endo-diastolic diameter was an independent risk factor for recurrent pericardial effusion. The clinical implications of our findings in daily clinical practice should be validated in future prospective studies. Further studies are warranted to clarify the underlying causality between them.

9.
Curr Opin Cardiol ; 39(3): 210-217, 2024 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38567948

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The goal of this review is to describe the current evidence available for remote monitoring devices available for patients with chronic heart failure, and also detail practical clinical recommendations for implementing these tools in daily clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS: Several devices ranging from sophisticated multiparametric algorithms in defibrillators, implantable pulmonary artery pressure sensors, and wearable devices to measure thoracic impedance can be utilized as important adjunctive tools to reduce the risk of heart failure hospitalization in patients with chronic heart failure. Pulmonary artery pressure sensors provide the most granular data regarding hemodynamic status, while alerts from wearable devices for thoracic impedance and defibrillator-based algorithms increase the likelihood of worsening clinical status while also having high negative predictive value when values are within normal range. SUMMARY: Multiple device-based monitoring strategies are available to reduce longitudinal risk in patients with chronic heart failure. Further studies are needed to best understand a practical pathway to integrate multiple signals of data for early clinical decompensation risk predictionVideo abstract: http://links.lww.com/HCO/A95.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Humanos , Doença Crônica , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Algoritmos
10.
J Cardiol ; 2024 Apr 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38580175

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve replacement is recommended for patients with "very severe" aortic stenosis (AS), irrespective of symptomatic manifestation. Nonetheless, the prognostic ramifications of "very severe" AS, as opposed to "severe" AS, subsequent to trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain enigmatic. METHODS: We enrolled consecutive patients who received TAVI at our institute between May 2015 and April 2021. We scrutinized the impact of baseline "very severe" AS upon 3-year all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization following TAVI, in comparison to "severe" AS. RESULTS: A total of 239 patients (84.8 ±â€¯5.4 years old, 58 men) were included. Baseline "very severe" AS was observed in 65 (27 %) patients, who exhibited more advanced hypertrophy and higher B-type natriuretic peptide levels compared to those with "severe" AS (p < 0.05 for both). Baseline "very severe" AS was paradoxically associated with higher freedom from the primary endpoint following TAVI compared to those with "severe" AS (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of baseline "very severe" AS was paradoxically associated with improved clinical outcomes subsequent to TAVI, in contrast to the cases of "severe" AS.

11.
J Cardiol ; 2024 Apr 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38580176

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The presence of insomnia exhibits a profound association with diverse cardiovascular pathologies. However, its prognostic implications in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for severe aortic stenosis remain ambiguous. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled patients who underwent TAVR for severe aortic stenosis at a prominent academic center from 2015 to 2022. The impact of insomnia, operationally defined as the prescription of soporific agents, on the two-year composite primary outcome comprising all-cause mortality and hospital readmissions was scrutinized. RESULTS: A cohort of 345 patients (median age 85 years, 99 males) was encompassed in the analysis. All subjects underwent successful TAVR and subsequent discharge. The presence of insomnia (N = 91) emerged as an independent predictor of the two-year composite endpoint, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.66 (95 % confidence interval 1.08-2.57, p = 0.022), significantly delineating the two-year cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint (40 % versus 30 %, p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: Approximately one-fourth of TAVR candidates manifested symptoms of insomnia, a condition autonomously correlated with heightened mortality and morbidity following the TAVR procedure. The optimal strategy for addressing insomnia in TAVR candidates constitutes a paramount consideration for future interventions.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA